Legal Opinion
People v. Sinclair
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 21, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), dated August 6, 2003, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the hearing court should not have considered his 1984 violent felony conviction in determining his risk assessment is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Cureton, 299 AD2d 532 [2002]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Victor R., 186 Misc 2d 28, 35-36 [2000]). Moreover, the prosecution…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BurgessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. CuretonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. Victor R.New York Supreme Court · 2000
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. FredlundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. MarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.