Legal Opinion

Shallal v. Gates

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 19, 2008No. Civil Action No. 07-2154 (RCL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court is defendant L-3’s motion [28] to strike the plaintiffs complaint and to dismiss the action. The plaintiff has also moved [34] to add Northrop Grumman as a defendant. Upon consideration of the motion [28], the opposition [33], the reply [36], the surreply [42], the entire record herein, and applicable law, the Court will GRANT the defendant’s motion and dismiss the action with prejudice. The Court will DENY plaintiffs motion to add Northrop Grumman as a defendant.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Shallal filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Garfield C. Thompson and Rubye A. Hankerson v. Lawrence JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. Sefton v. JewDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2000
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. ReinerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jiggetts v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Chennareddy v. WalkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Christmann v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. Danks v. Slawson Exploration Company, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2020
  5. Taylor v. ManisDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API