Legal Opinion
Christmann v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 20, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-2189Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DANIEL CHRISTMANN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-2189 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se plaintiff Daniel Christmann initiated this action in February 2022 and, after amending his complaint twice, seeks relief from the District of Columbia (“District” or “DC”) and the United States Capitol Police (“USCP”) for alleged violations of his rights due to their response to the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol Building. See Not. of Removal, Ex. 1., Superior Court…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.