Legal Opinion

Garfield C. Thompson and Rubye A. Hankerson v. Lawrence Johnson

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 17, 1958No. 13698_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

After a series of procedural steps in the District Court, Thompson and Hankerson, appellants here, on June 29, 1956, were granted an additional twenty days within which to file a more specific and definite complaint. The time for compliance having expired, the appellees on July 30, 1956, filed their timely motion to dismiss the original complaint. Some two months later, the appellants filed an amended complaint on October 1, 1956. Cutting through the maze, and after oral argument, the District Court, on October 3, 1956, granted the appel-lees’ motion to dismiss, and struck the appellants’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wesley Hall, Jr. v. Laura A. Killingsworth and Yeolen S. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. R. W. Agnew v. Richard W. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1967
  3. Page v. MandelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Shallal v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Bernstein v. Positive Directions Unlimited, Inc. (In re Positive Directions Unlimited, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API