Collier v. Holland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from Morgan superior court—Judge Park. January 1, 1919.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
In the order overruling the motion for a new trial the judge said: “In my opinion no error of law ivas committed by the court in the trial of said case, and under the following decisions, to wit: Hardin v. Stansel, 13 Ga. App. 22 [28 S. E. 681], Graves v. Hunnicutt, 8 Ga. App 99 [68 S. E. 558], Doonan v. Ives, 73 Ga. 295 (3), Mousseau v. Dorsett, 80 Ga. 566 [5 S. E. 780], Hill v. Wheeler, 2 Ga. App. 349 [58 S. E. 502], the evidence authorized the verdict rendered. As to the newly discovered evidence of Pleas. M. Todd as set out in the amended motion for new trial, it is only cumulative in its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doonan v. IvesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Graves v. HunnicuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Parker v. SalmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Hardin v. StanselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Hill & Moultrie v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. Lipscomb-Weyman-Chapman Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Upchurch v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929