People v. Elizalde
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
Under the rule of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, 478-479 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602] (Miranda), certain admonitions must be given before a suspect’s statement made during custodial interrogation can be admitted in the prosecution’s case-in-chief. Here we consider whether routine questions about gang affiliation, posed to defendant while processing him into jail on murder charges, come within Miranda’s well-recognized booking exception. We hold that the questions exceeded the scope of the exception and that officers should have known these questions were…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- People v. EdwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- United States v. Alfonzo WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- People v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.