Legal Opinion

People v. Mario Renee Perez

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 2010No. H033386PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUFFY, J.

A jury convicted defendant, Mario Renee Perez, of three sex offenses, each involving a different victim. He claims that the statute of limitations barred his prosecution on two of the three charges. He also claims that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the judgment as to one of his convictions and that evidence of child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome is generally inadmissible. Finding that recent California Supreme Court decisions compel rejection of his limitations claim and that his other claims lack merit, we will affirm the judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. W.R.C. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. (HC) Harlow v. NdohDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (HC) Iturralde v. AtchleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API