Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Covell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2008No. S-12517PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A visitor to a law office was injured when a chair in the office collapsed under him. He sued the owner of the law office to recover damages under two theories of liability: ordinary negligence and strict products liability. The superior court resolved both issues on summary judgment in favor of the office owner, and dismissed the suit with prejudice. Because the injured party failed to establish sufficient grounds under which a fact-finder could conclude that the office owner did not act reasonably in maintaining his office, and because we decline to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. City of Kotzebue v. McLeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Estate of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. CoxeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Cameron v. CHANG-CRAFTAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API