Legal Opinion
Gleason Industrial Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 14, 2008No. Slip Op. 08-42; Court 06-00089PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge:
This matter is before the Court following its grant of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) voluntary remand request. See Gleason Indus. Prods., Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 07-40, 2007 WL 781196 (CIT Mar. 16, 2007). On remand, Commerce held that Central Purchasing, LLC’s (“Central Purchasing”) welding carts were within the scope of an antidumping duty order in place against certain hand trucks manufactured in China. For the reasons that follow, Commerce’s results are sustained in part and remanded in part.
I. BACKGROUND
In 2004, Commerce entered an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Husteel Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Bond Street, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Gleason Indus. Prods., Inc. v. United StatesErrata: 10/24United States Court of International Trade · 2008