Legal Opinion

Gleason Indus. Prods., Inc. v. United StatesErrata: 10/24

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 22, 2008No. Court 06-00089Errata

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Senior Judge:

This matter is before the Court pursuant to our remand in Gleason Industrial Products, Inc. v. United States, 32 CIT _, 556 F.Supp.2d 1344 (2008) (“Gleason II"). On remand, the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) held that Central Purchasing, LLC’s (“Central Purchasing”) hand truck model 43615 was not within the scope of the antidumping duty order in place against certain hand trucks manufactured in China. For the reasons that follow, Commerce’s results are sustained.

I. BACKGROUND

The procedural history of this case has been laid out at length in Gleason II.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gleason Industrial Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API