Legal Opinion
Medrano v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 29, 1995No. 21665PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Ralph Medrano appeals from a district court’s order summarily dismissing Ms application for post-conviction relief. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A jury found Medrano guilty of first-degree Mdnapping as a result of Ms abduction of a fourteen-year-old girl for sexual purposes. I.C. § 18-4502. The judgment of conviction and sentence imposed by the district court were upheld on an earlier appeal. State v. Medrano, 123 Idaho 114, 844 P.2d 1364 (Ct.App.1992). Medrano subsequently filed an application for post-conviction relief and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hayes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sheahan v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. ArrasmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. AyalaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- Vick v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.