Legal Opinion

State v. Arrasmith

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1998No. 22831PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury found Kenneth Arrasmith guilty of one count of first degree murder and one count of second degree murder for the deaths of Luella Bingham and Ronald Bingham, respectively. I.C. §§ 18-4001, -4002 and -4003. As sentences for the murders, Arrasmith received a fixed life term and a concurrent term of twenty-five years to life. On appeal, Arrasmith asserts that the judgments of conviction and sentences should be overturned, claiming that he was denied a fair opportunity to present his defense as a result of various errors by the trial court. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. State v. WhippleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. DewbreIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API