Takosky v. Henning
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from an Order filed on October 26, 2005, at which time Appellant Ricky Henning was found to be in indirect criminal contempt for violating a Final Protection from Abuse Order entered on August 12, 2005. 1 We quash.
¶ 2 The facts and procedural history of the instant matter may be summarized as follows: On July 19, 2005, Appellee Shirley Takosky filed a Petition for Protection from Abuse in which she requested a Final Protection Order against Appellant. A Temporary Protection from Abuse Order was granted and a hearing on the Petition was held on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pace v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- In re N.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Sargent v. SargentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3Cited by24 opinions
- N.A.M. v. M.P.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- In re K.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- K.M.G. v. H.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- N.A.M. v. M.P.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Donnelly, H. v. Donnelly, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.