Legal Opinion

Takosky v. Henning

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 2006No. 2039 WDA 2005PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an Order filed on October 26, 2005, at which time Appellant Ricky Henning was found to be in indirect criminal contempt for violating a Final Protection from Abuse Order entered on August 12, 2005. 1 We quash.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history of the instant matter may be summarized as follows: On July 19, 2005, Appellee Shirley Takosky filed a Petition for Protection from Abuse in which she requested a Final Protection Order against Appellant. A Temporary Protection from Abuse Order was granted and a hearing on the Petition was held on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pace v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. In re N.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Sargent v. SargentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. N.A.M. v. M.P.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. In re K.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. K.M.G. v. H.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. N.A.M. v. M.P.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Donnelly, H. v. Donnelly, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API