Fried v. Fried
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
The instant divorce action has been in litigation for five years and demonstrates a procedural practice which creates unacceptable delay in the disposition of matrimonial cases. The relevant facts arose in October,. 1981 when the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County awarded to appellee the sum of $1,000.00 for interim counsel fees and expenses and $1,250.00 for payment of master’s fees and stenographic costs. On appeal the Superior Court, 326 Pa.Super. 271, 473 A.2d 1087, held: (1) that an order granting interim fees and expenses is a final and appealable order;…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kurtas v. KurtasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Motheral v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.