Legal Opinion

Marcoe v. Bell International

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 14, 1994No. CA 93-1379PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

The appellant in this workers’ compensation case filed a claim for temporary total disability and medical benefits alleging that he sustained a compensable injury in the course and scope of his employment as a diesel mechanic for the appellee, Bell International. After a hearing, the administrative law judge found that the appellant failed to prove that he sustained a compensable injury. On appeal to the full Commission, the decision of the administrative law judge was adopted as the decision of the Commission. From that decision, comes this appeal.

For reversal, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Williams v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  3. W. Shanhouse & Sons, Inc. v. SimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Grimes v. North American FoundryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  5. St. Vincent Infirmary v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. Majestic HotelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Hawkins Construction v. MaxellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Morelock v. Kearney Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Morelock v. Kearney Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  5. White v. Frolic FootwearCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API