Legal Opinion

White v. Frolic Footwear

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 1, 1997No. CA 96-1533Published

1Opinion of the Court

952 S.W.2d 190 (1997)

59 Ark.App. 12

Debbie WHITE, Appellant,

v.

FROLIC FOOTWEAR, Appellees.

No. CA 96-1533.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I and IV.

October 1, 1997.

Anthony W. Bartels, Jonesboro, for Appellant.

Robert H. Montgomery, Little Rock, for Appellee.

ROGERS, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Workers' Compensation Commission's decision finding that appellant failed to prove that she sustained a compensable injury identifiable by time and place of occurrence. On appeal, appellant argues that there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission's decision. We disagree and affirm.

Wh…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Murch-Jarvis Company, Inc. v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. W. Shanhouse & Sons, Inc. v. SimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Johnson v. American Pulpwood Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. White v. Frolic FootwearCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API