Kuhn v. Majestic Hotel
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Judith Rogers, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision finding that appellant had failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he sustained a compensable back injury or that the subsequent surgery was reasonable and necessary medical treatment. On appeal, appellant argues that there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision. We disagree and affirm.
The record reveals that appellant worked for appellee as a cook. He had been working for two to three months when, on March 20, 1992, he allegedly slipped in a puddle of water in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gencorp Polymer Products v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Shaw v. Commercial RefrigerationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Johnson v. Riceland FoodsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- Brantley v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- Marcoe v. Bell InternationalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kuhn v. Majestic HotelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Williams v. Prostaff TemporariesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- General Electric Railcar Repair Services v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998