State v. Revelle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Defendant argues six assignments of error on appeal. We have carefully considered each assignment and conclude that the trial court committed no error which would entitle defendant to a new trial.
By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the trial court erred when it allowed the State, over defendant’s objection, to obtain a bill of indictment on the charge of burglary on the same day defendant was called to trial on the burglary and other three charges. On 18 November 1979 defendant was served with arrest warrants for larceny, rape, and armed robbery. On 7…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. LoukWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.