Dauphiny v. Buhne
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. W. Hill for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an action for libel. In the early part of 1901 plaintiff was a member of the firm of A. C. Dauphiny & Company, doing a general merchandise business in the city of Eureka, and both he and defendant were members of the common council of said city. At that time there was presented to the council petitions by various railroad companies for franchises to operate their roads across the city front of the city. Among these petitioning companies was the California & Northern Railroad Company. Diverse views were held by members of the council as to the terms and conditions upon which these…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schomberg v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Carpenter v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Bailey v. Kalamazoo Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Chamberlin v. VanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Jarman v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Snively v. Record Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- O'Brien v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Starks v. ComerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Peabody v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.