Peabody v. Barham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of The complaint charged that the defendants wrongfully defamed plaintiff and brought her into contempt and by publishing in the columns of a widely circulated daily the following statement: “Eddie Peabody’s divorcing wife, ten years his senior, is also his aunt! ’ ’ The innuendo which follows the alleged libelous words sets forth that the article referred to plaintiff’s husband, Edwin Ellsworth Peabody; that by the phrase “divorcing wife” defendants intended to designate plaintiff and that by the expression “Eddie Peabody’s divorcing wife . . . also his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bates v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Noral v. Hearst Publications, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Manley v. HarerMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Tulsa Tribune Co. v. KightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Smith v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Selleck v. Globe International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Pridonoff v. BalokovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.