Legal Opinion

Peabody v. Barham

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1942No. Civ. 13481PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of The complaint charged that the defendants wrongfully defamed plaintiff and brought her into contempt and by publishing in the columns of a widely circulated daily the following statement: “Eddie Peabody’s divorcing wife, ten years his senior, is also his aunt! ’ ’ The innuendo which follows the alleged libelous words sets forth that the article referred to plaintiff’s husband, Edwin Ellsworth Peabody; that by the phrase “divorcing wife” defendants intended to designate plaintiff and that by the expression “Eddie Peabody’s divorcing wife . . . also his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bates v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Noral v. Hearst Publications, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Manley v. HarerMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Tulsa Tribune Co. v. KightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Smith v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Selleck v. Globe International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Pridonoff v. BalokovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API