Legal Opinion

Cantwell v. City of Boise

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2008No. 34283PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

Jonathan Cantwell brought suit against the City of Boise, claiming he was wrongfully terminated from his employment in the City’s Public Works Department. His suit included claims against several fellow employees. The City moved for summary judgment on all claims and the district court granted the same. Cantwell appealed.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Jonathan Cantwell commenced employment with the City of Boise as a maintenance worker in the Public Works Department around February 1, 1994. On February 3, 1994, he acknowledged (1) receipt of a copy of the Boise City…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Cecelia Yin v. State of California Daryll Tsujihara Linda Nicholson Robert Catale and Tony SunseriCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Jenkins v. Boise Cascade Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Garner v. PoveyIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Wesco Autobody Supply, Inc. v. ErnestIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Arambarri v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Syringa Networks, LLC v. Idaho Department of AdministrationIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. KEPLER-FLEENOR v. Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API