Legal Opinion

Garner v. Povey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2011No. 37561PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

Following the decision of this case on the merits, the Appellants sought an award of attorney fees under the “commercial transaction” prong of I.C. § 12-120(3) and for frivolous litigation under I.C. § 12-121. The district court denied fees on both grounds. We affirm the denial of fees under I.C. § 12-121, but reverse the denial under I.C. § 12-120(3).

I

Factual and Procedural Background

This case arose out of a dispute as to the easement rights of the Respondents over property formerly owned by the Appellants. On May 22, 1987, Daniel Garner entered into a contract to purchase…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. C & G, INC. v. RuleIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Farmers National Bank v. ShireyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Idaho Transportation Department v. Ascorp, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC v. Wally Enterprises, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Harris, Inc. v. Foxhollow Construction & Trucking, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Intermountain Real Properties, LLC v. Draw, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API