Legal Opinion
Packard v. County of Otter Tail
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 27, 1928No. 26,617PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
Respondents petitioned for the formation of a new school district to include a part of school districts 77, 84, 94 and 102 in Otter Tail county. The county board gave all parties a full hearing and rejected the petition. No fraud is charged. An appeal was taken to the district court wherein this question was submitted to the jury: “Was the action of the board of county commissioners arbitrary or unreasonable ?” The answer was “Yes.”
The rule of law is well established in this state that the determination…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State ex rel. Dybdal v. State Securities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Hunstiger v. KilianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Brazil v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- State v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- County of Hennepin v. MikulaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. OhmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.