Legal Opinion

In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1956No. 36,562, 36,673, 36,689PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

246 Minn. 96 (1956)

IN RE CONSOLIDATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS NOS. 42, 43, 48, 86, 105, 108, 115, AND PARTS OF NOS. 76, 84, 128, AND 140, FREEBORN COUNTY.

RANDOLPH THORLAND AND OTHERS

v.

INDEPENDENT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 44.[1]

Nos. 36,562, 36,673, 36,689.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 6, 1956.

Moody & Springsted, Dorsey, Colman, Barker, Scott & Barber, and De Forest Spencer, for appellant.

Ray G. Moonan, George A. Lewis, Peterson, Peterson & Nordin, Maloney & Wheeler, and Moonan, Moonan, Friedel & Senn, for respondents.

KNUTSON, JUSTICE.

These are appeals from orders and judgment of the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Luley v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Hunstiger v. KilianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Brazil v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Farrell v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Application of City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Minnesota Association of Public Schools v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Town of Burnsville v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 581, Edgerton v. MattheisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Lieser v. Town of St. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API