Legal Opinion

Geeslin v. Farney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 30, 1926No. 14926Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

Action by J. P. Farney, as plaintiff, against Cora B. Geeslin and E. C. Geeslin to' foreclose a certain mortgage given to secure the payment of $2,000 with interest and attorney’s fees..Defendants answer admits tlie execution of the note and mortgage to plaintiff, but pleads usury, alleging at the time they executed the note for $2,000, bearing 10% interest, they also executed a note in the principal sum of $200, and a mortgage securing same, to W. L. Owen, the agent of the plaintiff, and this note is the basis of the usury allegation.

Plaintiff replied, denying usury; the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Garland v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Continental Gin Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API