Legal Opinion
Penny v. Kennedy
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided November 13, 1986No. CIV-1-86-417PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDGAR, District Judge.
Six Chattanooga police officers have brought this action against the City of Chattanooga, Tennessee and its Commissioner of Fire and Police, Tom Kennedy. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief regarding a proposed program of mass urine testing of Chattanooga police officers which the City is proposing to conduct. Plaintiffs assert federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Although filed and heard separately, this case ,is essentially a companion case to Roland M. Lovvorn, et al. v. The City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, et al., 647 F.Supp.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lovvorn v. City of Chattanooga, Tenn.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Federation of Government Employees v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1986
- Feliciano v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- Fr. Order of Police v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Penny v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Taylor v. O'GRADYDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.