Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Evans
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 12, 1911No. 968PublishedCited by 23 opinions
Error from District Court, Roger Mills County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by J. W. Holmes against F. A. Evans. From a judgment for the defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This proceeding in error seeks to review the judgment of the lower court'in an action of replevin, wherein the plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and the defendant in error defendant. The amended petition and affidavit set up a special ownership in a stock of goods by virtue of a written contract. The body of said contract is in words and figures as follows':
“It is hereby agreed by J. W. Holmes (known in this contract as the party of the first part) that he shall convey to F. A. Evans (known in this contract as the party of the second part) his stock of mdse, now located in the Odd Fellows &…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Eighmie v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stone v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Stebbins v. Lena Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Colbert v. First Nat. Bank of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Rawlings v. UferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- First Nat. Bank v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.