Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. Beatty

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1935No. 24492PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action commenced by J. H. Beatty and Grace T. Beatty, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against the First National Bank in Tonkawa, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to recover the value of a diamond ring pledged as collateral to a note given the bank by plaintiffs, which collateral the defendant bank failed to return upon tender and demand, said ring allegedly having been lost through bank robbery.

Plaintiffs alleged the value of the ring to be $2,950, and prayed for that amount, .with interest, less any amount' that- might be found due and owing to defendant on •the note…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gafford v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Holmes v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Bower-Venus Grain Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Whitehead Coal Mining Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Rock Island Coal Mining Co. v. GalvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PardockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Safety Cab Co. v. FairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Hair v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. McCarley v. DurhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Moore v. EmersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API