People v. Young
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
In People v McCoy, 392 Mich 231; 220 NW2d 456 (1974), this Court invented a new rule regarding cautionary instructions on accomplice testimony. That rule provided that the trial court’s failure to give a cautionary instruction upon a defense request requires reversal of a conviction. Moreover, reversal may be required even in the absence of a defense request if the issue of guilt is “closely drawn.” We reject the McCoy rule because it has no basis in Michigan law. Indeed, it contravenes long-standing authorities according discretion to trial courts in deciding whether to provide a cautionary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. LockettMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. SchaeferMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. HawthorneMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. OrlewiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People of Michigan v. Dakota Lee ShorterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.