Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Baking Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1941No. 1270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a suit under the provisions of Title VII of the Revenue Act of 1936, 7 U.S.C.A. § 623 note, 644 et seq., for the recovery of $1,790.23 paid by the plaintiff as floor stocks taxes under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq. The facts are as follows:

1. The plaintiff paid the taxes in question on August 4, 1933.

2. The plaintiff filed a claim for refund on Form Pt-76, on June 22, 1937.

3. The Commissioner rejected the plaintiff’s claim for refund on December 12, 1938.

4. The plaintiff filed inventory as of July 9, 1933, of what stock it had on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Lee Wilson & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. Hutzler Bros. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
  4. United States v. Elgin Nat. Watch Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  5. Ney v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. South Coast Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  2. Bullock's, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
  3. South Coast Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API