Legal Opinion

Bullock's, Inc. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 26, 1942No. 1109-H CivilPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks a refund of floor taxes imposed upon cotton goods by the Agricultural Adjustment Act, 48 Stat. 31, 7 U.S.C.A. §§ 601-620, subsequently held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The demand is for the sum of $8,048.37 paid upon an inventory of approximately $2,250,-000 of stock. The defense is a general denial.

In the trial, defendant objected to the introduction of all evidence not submitted to the Commissioner, taking the position in effect, that in this proceeding we are confined to a review of that record as in the case of appeal. The court reserved…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Lee Wilson & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. Grain Belt Supply Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  5. Oswald Jaeger Baking Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Bullock's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API