South Coast Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, successor to South Coast Company, an extensive grower of sugar cane, a larger refiner of sugar, and a quondam maker of molasses, received a dis-allowance, by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and by The Tax Court, of its claim in the sum of $244,424.40, for a refund of processing taxes paid by it and its predecessor under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.
After the decision in United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 312, 80 L.Ed. 477, 102 A.L.R. 914, declaring the taxing provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hilton M. Etheridge and Herman Savage, T/a Starlite Restaurant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- George Doty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- South Coast Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950