Hutzler Bros. Co. v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
The sole question in this case is whether the conditions for allowance of refunds prescribed in Section 902 of the Revenue Act of 1936, 7 U.S.C.A. § 644, relating to floor stocks taxes, assessed under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, have been met by the plaintiff. This act was passed following the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 312, 80 L.Ed. 477, 102 A.L.R. 914, declaring unconstitutional the Agricultural Adjustment Act of May 12th, 1933, 48 Stat. 31, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq. The plaintiff, a Maryland…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
3Cited by13 opinions
- Samara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Bethlehem Baking Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- C. B. Cones & Son Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Blumenthal Print Works v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.