Legal Opinion

Heines Peterson v. Prutsman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 29, 1926No. 26029PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Plaintiffs, as subcontractors, agreed with defendant, contractor with the state highway commission, to build certain bridges in section C on the Pearl River, Franklinton and Mississippi highway, in the parish of Washington, this state. In the agreement it was stipulated that defendant was to furnish and deliver the necessary materials at the points where the work was to be performed.

The present suit is to recover damages in the sum of $2,738.90 for the delay caused by defendant’s failure to promptly deliver the materials, for loss of profits because plaintiffs were not permitted to build the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turregano v. BarnettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Haile v. McGhee, Snowden & ViolettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  3. Sloan v. StevensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1872
  4. Succession of MarrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
  5. Woodley v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pipes v. Jesse F. Heard & Sons, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Zibilich v. RittenbergLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Hedges v. ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Hortman-Salmen Co. v. BechtelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API