Hortman-Salmen Co. v. Bechtel
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
This is a suit for the sum of $104.05 alleged to be the balance due on an open account. Defendant entered a general denial and specially pleaded payment.
There was judgment dismissing the suit, '■ and plaintiff has appealed.
The record shows that the plaintiff furnished material for the construction of a building on defendant’s ground. Defendant was desirous of obtaining a statement in full from the plaintiff of the account, in order that he might put a price on the property to sell it. It appears that the defendant told Mr. Ryan, one of the managers of the plaintiff company, that he wanted a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hudson River Railroad v. LoebThe Superior Court of New York City · 1868
- Palfrey v. StinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1837
- Haile v. McGhee, Snowden & ViolettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
- Sloan v. StevensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1872
- Succession of MarrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.