Legal Opinion

Hortman-Salmen Co. v. Bechtel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1930No. 13,071Published

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

This is a suit for the sum of $104.05 alleged to be the balance due on an open account. Defendant entered a general denial and specially pleaded payment.

There was judgment dismissing the suit, '■ and plaintiff has appealed.

The record shows that the plaintiff furnished material for the construction of a building on defendant’s ground. Defendant was desirous of obtaining a statement in full from the plaintiff of the account, in order that he might put a price on the property to sell it. It appears that the defendant told Mr. Ryan, one of the managers of the plaintiff company, that he wanted a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudson River Railroad v. LoebThe Superior Court of New York City · 1868
  2. Palfrey v. StinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1837
  3. Haile v. McGhee, Snowden & ViolettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  4. Sloan v. StevensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1872
  5. Succession of MarrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API