Legal Opinion

Turregano v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 12, 1910No. 18,141PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides; W. F. Blackman, Judge. Action by J. P. Turregano against J. H. Barnett and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, J.

Plaintiff sues for the liquidation and settlement of an alleged commercial partnership between himself and J. H. Barnett and W. R. O’Neal, alleging that the partnership was formed on October 1, 1908, at which date he advanced $2,724.03, under an agreement that he should thereafter receive 60 per cent, of the profits of the business, and share the losses in the same proportion, and that on January 1st following he should advance the further sum of $1,-, 541.65, which amount said parties owed him. He further alleges that he made said second advance, as agreed,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Orleans & N. E. R. v. Louisiana Const. & Imp. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Hager v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  3. Gray v. LonsdaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  4. Haile v. McGhee, Snowden & ViolettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  5. Flower v. MillaudonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. TalbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Kemp v. HudnallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Vosbein v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Heines Peterson v. PrutsmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. David Trahan v. Morton International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API