Legal Opinion

Succession of Marr

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1871No. 3122PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Second District Court, parish of Orleans.

1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, J.

The facts on which this controversy is based seernto be as follows: Gr. W. L. Marr died in Tennessee, and his son Richard became Administrator of his estate. Lonsdale, of New Orleans, was indebted to Gr. W. L. Marr in the sum of $3000, as shown by three several promissory notes of $1000 each held by Richard Marr, the administrator, who, coming to New Orleans to collect these notes, found the debtor unwilling to make payment except to an administrator appointed in Louisiana. To obviate this difficulty Richard Marr prevailed upon Robert H. Marr, the defendant in this case, to take out letters…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Heines Peterson v. PrutsmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Woodley v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Hedges v. ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Hortman-Salmen Co. v. BechtelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API