Legal Opinion
Banning Teachers Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Board
California Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1988No. L.A. 32300PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PANELLI, J.
We granted review to consider whether a parity or “me-too” agreement between a school district and its classified staff violates the provisions of sections 3545 and 3543.5 of the Government Code. Spe cifically, does a parity agreement violate subdivision (b)(3) of section 3545, requiring that classified and certificated employees not be included in the same bargaining unit, 2 or subdivision (c) of section 3543.5, requiring that a school district negotiate in good faith with its certificated employees? 3 We conclude that parity agreements are not per se violative of either…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Boling v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- California State Employees' Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Inglewood Teachers Ass'n. v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.