SodexoMAGIC, LLC v. Drexel Univ.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtBaylson, J.
I. Introduction
The Court has reviewed the 50 documents submitted in camera by both Plaintiff and Defendant, as samples of disputed claims of privilege, and has assessed each party's privilege determinations.
For civil matters, the Pennsylvania Code provides: "Counsel shall not be competent or permitted to testify to confidential communications made to him by his client, nor shall the client be compelled to disclose the same, unless in either case this privilege is waived upon the trial by the client." 42 Pa.C.S. § 5928 (civil) ; see also Loutzenhiser v. Doddo, 436 Pa. 512, 260 A.2d 745, 748…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled February 14, 1978. Appeal of Nathan MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Montgomery County v. Microvote Corporation Carson Manufacturing Company, Inc. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- In Re: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Langer v. Ohio State Univ. Office of Univ. Compliance & IntegrityOhio Court of Claims · 2023
- DEITZEL v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- NUPSON v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- TRUSH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023