Legal Opinion

DEITZEL v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00035Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN DIETZEL, et al., : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, : : v. : No.: 22-cv-0035 : COSTCO WHOLESALE, et al. : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM SITARSKI, M.J. July 12, 2022 Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce (1) Video Surveillance Referenced in Defendants’ Discovery Responses; (2) Defendants’ Warehouse Incident Report (Typed and Handwritten); and (3) More Specific Responses to Plaintiffs’ Interrogatories (Mot. to Compel, ECF No. 17) and Defendants’ response in opposition thereto…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Harper v. Auto-Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API