Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled February 14, 1978. Appeal of Nathan Markowitz
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 23, 1979No. 79-1685PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is taken from the May 22, 1979 Order of the District Court for the District of New Jersey which directed that Nathan Markowitz, Esq. be confined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1826 for refusing to disclose the identity of his client and for refusing to produce documents called for by a grand jury subpoena which had been served on him. Markowitz claimed both his and his client’s fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination and the attorney-client privilege when he refused to name his client. He also claimed these privileges when…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Glen Smith, Elton Rieara, Elvis Smith and Roland GeorgesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Levy v. Senate of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- In the Matter of Carl Walsh, a Witness Before the Special September 1978 Grand Jury. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.