Legal Opinion
Myers v. Cohen
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 1984No. 9203; CIVIL NO. 71985PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
TANAKA, J.
In a tort action, plaintiff Michael S. Myers (Myers) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants, attorney John Rapp (Rapp) and the law partnership of Goodsill, Anderson & Quinn (GA&Q) (collectively appellees). The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the court below erred in granting the summary judgment. We answer no and affirm.
Viewing the evidence and the inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, as we must under Rule 56, Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) (1981), Fernandez v. Tenbruggencate, 65 Haw. 226, 649…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Kathryn E. Steven, Administratrix of the Estate of George A. Steven, Deceased v. Roscoe Turner Aeronautical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Matsuura v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- Kahala Royal Corp. v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Wong v. PanisHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.