Legal Opinion
Kahala Royal Corp. v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 2007No. 26669, 26670PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
MOON, C.J.
Inasmuch as appeal Nos. 26669 and 26670 present identical relevant facts and similar legal issues, we consolidated these appeals for purposes of disposition, pursuant to Ha-wai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 3(b) (2006). 1 Central to both appeals is the applicability of the defenses of litigation immunity, collateral estoppel, and waiver, as well as whether the defendants in both actions were entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees, pursuant to Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 607-14 (Supp.2005), quoted infra.
The parties to appeal No. 26669 are…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
- Edward Crowell v. State Public Defender v. Iowa District Court for Linn CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.