Legal Opinion

State v. Lewus

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 30, 1992No. 1 CA-CR 90-1393PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

Defendant, Thomas Franklin Lewus, pled no contest to leaving the scene of an injury accident, a class 6 felony. On appeal defendant argues that the trial court erred when it imposed restitution by order without his presence. We agree with defendant.

FACTS

As part of his plea agreement, defendant agreed to pay restitution not to exceed $3,000. At the change of plea proceeding the trial judge notified defendant that he would be required to pay restitution in an amount not to exceed $3,000. The prosecutor pointed out that at that point in time, the victim had incurred $600.00 in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. State v. ScrogginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. State v. GeorgeoffArizona Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. State v. SteffyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Badura v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lindsay R. v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. State v. TackmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API