Lindsay R. v. Cohen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWANN, Judge.
¶ 1 The petitioners in this special action contend that under the Victims’ Bill of Rights (“VBR”), Ariz. Const, art. 2, § 2.1, victims’ counsel was authorized to substitute for the prosecutor in criminal restitution proceedings. Because no provision of the VBR authorizes privatization of the restitution process, we hold that such substitution is not allowed.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In December 2012, Jeffrey David Meyn was indicted for the manslaughter of James R. Soon thereafter, private counsel entered a notice of appearance on behalf of James R.’s surviving…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Lynn v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. LambertonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. Kemp ex rel. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice v. DuceyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice v. DuceyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.