Rasmussen v. Miller

In its memorandum decision on the motion for rehearing the trial court stated:

“In view of all the statements made by the bailiff herein and by others, before and after the March 26th order, we feel that we now should absolve plaintiff Rasmussen’s brother from any imputation of misconduct in connection with conversation or other contact with one of the jurors. . . .

“Thus, the identity of plaintiff’s brother has whittled down — to nothingness, it may be assumed. The content of conversation similarly has been reduced to a void.

“Throughout, however, the four statements by the bailiff, one .fact…