Dostal v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Upon defendant’s appeal the questions are, (1) whether the evidence supports the finding that John Magee was negligent as to management and control, and (2) whether there should be a new trial because of alleged misconduct of Mrs. Matzek, a juror. Plaintiff’s appeal raises a third question: Did the trial court err in limiting the amount of the judgment so that the two judgments did not exceed the limits of the policy?(1) Jury’s finding of negligence sustained. The jury may have accepted the version of the accident related by Marlys Tyler. There was evidence of statements previously made by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- La Valley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Sandeen v. Willow River Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. CotterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Burmek v. Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- McEachern v. BrackettWashington Supreme Court · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ayala v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2001
- Nichols v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Kuehn v. KuehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Nyberg v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Attoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.