Legal Opinion

State v. Knox

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1995No. 17035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from the trial court’s determination that the state may not pursue forfeiture under R.C. 2933.43, Ohio’s contraband forfeiture statute, if the defendant’s underlying crime is drug abuse in violation of R.C. 2925.11. We reverse.

The defendant-appellee, Eric E. Knox, Sr., was charged with drug abuse after police discovered cocaine in his 1986 Pontiac Grand Am. Pursuant to R.C. 2933.43, the state petitioned for forfeiture of the Grand Am as contraband. At the forfeiture hearing, the trial court did not receive any evidence other than the parties’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Akron v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CainOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API