Legal Opinion

City of Akron v. Turner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1993No. 16309PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Judge.

Defendant James Turner has appealed from an order of the Akron Municipal Court that granted forfeiture of stereo equipment from his automobile. He has argued that the trial court (1) incorrectly found that Akron sufficiently complied with the notice provisions of R.C. 2933.43, and (2) incorrectly granted forfeiture without making a specific finding that the forfeiture at issue was not excessive. This court reverses and remands this matter for further proceedings because the city failed to comply with the notice provisions of R.C. 2933.43.

I

Defendant was convicted of violating…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Department of Liquor Control v. Sons of Italy Lodge 0917Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aravanis v. Somerset CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. State v. KnoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. City of Hamilton v. CallonOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. City of Hamilton v. Callon, Unpublished Decision (5-27-1997)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API