State v. Hill
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Appellant raises various propositions of law for our determination. Appellant essentially challenges the jury’s finding of guilt, the sentence imposed by the trial court, and the forfeiture of his apartment complex.
I
Finding of Guilt
As a threshold matter, appellant assails his conviction of complicity to trafficking in marijuana. R.C. 2923.03(A)(2) provides that “[n]o person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall * * * [a]id or abet another in committing the offense * * *.” R.C. 2925.03(A)(3) sets forth that “[n]o person shall knowingly * * *…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- State v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Patrick (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. SamatarOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. MoaningOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.